|
|
|
|
JOURNAL
OF
SPORTS SCIENCE &
MEDICINE
|
 |
|
Research
article
|
GROUND REACTION FORCE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RUNNING SHOES, RACING FLATS, AND DISTANCE SPIKES IN RUNNERS |
|||||||||
Suzanna Logan, Ian Hunter  ,
J. Ty Hopkins, J.T., J. Brent Feland and Allen C. Parcell |
|||||||||
Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
© Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2010) 9, 147 - 153 |
|||||||||
|
|
| ABSTRACT | |||
| Various shoes are worn by distance runners throughout a training
season. This study measured the differences in ground reaction forces between
running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in order to provide information
about the potential effects of footwear on injury risk in highly competitive
runners. Ten male and ten female intercollegiate distance runners ran across
a force plate at 6.7 m·s-1 (for males) and 5.7 m·s-1 (for females) in each
of the three types of shoes. To control for differences in foot strike,
only subjects who exhibited a heel strike were included in the data analysis.
Two repeated-measures ANOVAs with Tukey's post-hoc tests (p < 0.05) were
used to detect differences in shoe types among males and females. For the
males, loading rate, peak vertical impact force and peak braking forces
were significantly greater in flats and spikes compared to running shoes.
Vertical stiffness in spikes was also significantly greater than in running
shoes. Females had significantly shorter stance times and greater maximum
propulsion forces in racing flats compared to running shoes. Changing footwear
between the shoes used in this study alters the loads placed on the body.
Care should be taken as athletes enter different phases of training where
different footwear is required. Injury risk may be increased since the body
may not be accustomed to the differences in force, stance time, and vertical
stiffness. Key words: Footwear, impact, track. |
|